<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>Heretica</title><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/</link><description>This blog is intended to carry my feelings as they are without dissipation or toning down.</description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Imagine</title><description>Complete twat wasn't he?</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/05/03/imagine/#c444963</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:48:57 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Conscience</title><description>Just out of curiousity, and it is none of my business, i ask you: what ideals have you grown tired of? Who are these people that you did hold such a high regard for that has now wavered? You seem... maybe confused by losing these beliefs, like you aren't sure where you stand. Is that right? Or wrong? Or really none of my business?</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/06/01/conscience/#c52132</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:22:04 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Conscience</title><description>This is a question of ethics, is it? Can a person really describe their ethics to another? I don't think so. It's like asking someone what they dream about. You can give one or two examples, but you could never describe the full spectrum of moods and feelings and half-thoughts that make up a dream.&lt;br&gt;
In the same way, someone's ethics are not a set number of rules. They are just how that person responds each and every situation. Sometimes they conflict. For example... You are an elected member of parliment. The people who elected you want you to take a stance on abortion that you personally are opposed to. What do you do? Your ethics dictate that you should be justified in going with your own view on abortion, but then again, you don't represent yourself, you represent the voters. And you see what they think as wrong....&lt;br&gt;
So there is no black and white with ethics. Nobody can have perfect judgement. As you say, we are all human. But we used to be monkeys, and maybe one day we'll replace ourselves with something better. That would be good; non-genetic evolution. A new type of mind created by the developement of our philosophies...oh but that's just fantasy. What was you're question again?</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/06/01/conscience/#c52127</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:17:48 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Monsoon in Pune</title><description>hi!&lt;br&gt;
just wanted to tell u that rains in your city brings the most saddest part of ur city alive.i'm here in pune since past 11months but the most horrible part is the rains and the famous rivers which have turned to a sewage flow!&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/06/27/monsoon_in_pune/#c31776</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:51:51 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Getting started</title><description>welcome to the world of blogging. i too from Pune.</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/04/28/getting_started_1/#c6660</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:06:01 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Getting started</title><description>Blog away my friend!</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/04/28/getting_started_1/#c6399</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:43:49 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Getting started</title><description>Welcome to blogdom :)</description><link>http://heretica.blog.co.uk/2005/04/28/getting_started_1/#c6367</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:37:08 +0200</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
